Top Navigation Bar

@*土石流及大規模崩塌防災資訊網logo圖片*@ Debris Flow and Large-Scale Landslide Disaster Prevention Information Network logo image @*土石流及大規模崩塌防災資訊網名稱圖片*@ Debris Flow and Large-Scale Landslide Disaster Prevention Information Network name image
Debris Flow and Large-Scale Landslide Disaster Prevention Information Network

應變開設專區

0814豪雨土石流及大規模崩塌災害緊急應變小組 級開設 未來48小時紅黃警戒推估

警戒統計資訊

紅色警戒

  • 0
    土石流潛勢溪流
  • 0
    縣市
  • 0
    鄉鎮
  • 0
    村里
  • 0
    大規模崩塌潛勢區
  • 0
    縣市
  • 0
    鄉鎮
  • 0
    村里

黃色警戒

  • 0
    土石流潛勢溪流
  • 0
    縣市
  • 0
    鄉鎮
  • 0
    村里
  • 0
    大規模崩塌潛勢區
  • 0
    縣市
  • 0
    鄉鎮
  • 0
    村里

警戒地圖與縣市列表

桃園市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
新竹縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
苗栗市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
臺中市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
彰化縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
雲林縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
嘉義縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
臺南市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
新北市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
高雄市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
臺北市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
基隆市
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
宜蘭縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
南投縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
花蓮縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
臺東縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒
屏東縣
土石流警戒 0 0
大規模崩塌警戒 0 0
目前無發布任何警戒

Disaster Potential

·

Debris Flow Delimitation Method

Delimitation Method

The delimitation of the affected area for 『debris flow potential stream』 is divided into three stages: preliminary indoor delimitation, field investigation and revision based on local topography, and final indoor editing. These stages are detailed below.

I. Preliminary Delimitation of the Affected Area
The delimitation method is based on the location of the valley mouth and/or the overflow point and the angle of the alluvial fan. The radius length of the alluvial fan is calculated using Ikeda's formula.
  1. Delimiting the Affected Area: Determine Vertex A of the affected area—defined as the valley exit, the alluvial fan apex, or a point with a slope of 10 degrees. From Point A, a fan-shaped area is projected downstream, based on the maximum 『debris flow』 expansion angle (105 degrees). Finally, the contour line B with a slope of 2 degrees within the fan area is used as the 『debris flow』 terminus boundary. The area enclosed by the fan-shaped region and line B is the final 『debris flow』 affected area.
  2. Alluvial Fan Radius Length: The radius length of the alluvial fan is calculated using Ikeda's formula, as shown below:
    Log(L) = 0.42 × Log(V × tanθα) + 0.935
    Where V is the Sediment Discharge Volume (90% Non-Exceedance Probability) $(m^{3})$, ; $V=70,992A^{0.61}$; A is the area of the 『catchment area』 above the overflow point $(km^{2})$; L is the Deposition Length (m); $\theta_{\alpha}$ is the slope of the flow zone.
@*豐丘潛勢溪流 105度扇形範圍*@Fengqiu Potential Stream 105-degree Fan-shaped Area
Fengqiu Potential Stream - 105-Degree Fan-Shaped Affected Area
II. Field Revision of the Debris Flow Affected Area
  1. Using the preliminary 105-degree fan-shaped area estimated by Ikeda's formula as the base map, the overflow points are repositioned based on field survey results (e.g., valley mouth, obstructions, or areas of sudden slope decrease). The boundary is then revised according to the local topography, excluding areas that 『debris flow』 cannot possibly traverse. If the fan radius calculated by Ikeda's formula is insufficient to cover the entire area of protected households, the radius length is extended based on the field survey's findings. Furthermore, if the field investigation reveals additional overflow points near protected households that are not on the base map, the affected area for the stream is expanded according to the aforementioned field delimitation principles.
  2. If the field investigation determines that there are no protected households near the stream's overflow point, the 『debris flow』 affected area will not be delimited for that stream.
III. Indoor Editing of the Debris Flow Affected Area
Based on the GPS coordinates of the stream and overflow points obtained from the field survey, and the field-revised 『debris flow』 affected area base map, the indoor process involves overlaying and editing the data to create a digital layer using 1:5,000 black-and-white aerial photo base maps or color orthophoto images.
@*土石流潛勢溪流影響範圍區修正範例圖*@Example Diagram of the Revised Debris Flow Potential Stream Affected Area
Example Diagram of the Revised Debris Flow Potential Stream Affected Area
@*新增土石流潛勢溪流判定標準流程圖*@Flow Chart for Adding New Debris Flow Potential Streams
Flow Chart for Adding New Debris Flow Potential Streams
IV. Standard Procedure for Determining New Debris Flow Potential Streams
@*室內地形判釋與野外現勘調查進行分析比對*@Comparison and Analysis between Indoor Terrain Interpretation and Outdoor Field Investigation
Comparison and Analysis between Indoor Terrain Interpretation and Outdoor Field Investigation
V. Debris Flow Affected Area Delimitation Steps
  1. Preliminary Delimitation of the Affected Area
  2. Field Revision of the Debris Flow Affected Area
  3. Indoor Editing of the Debris Flow Affected Area
Debris Flow Risk Level Assessment

The risk level assessment for 『debris flow potential stream』 is composed of two factors—"Occurrence Potential Level" and "Protected Household Level"—and incorporates the concept of risk. In risk assessment, many countries, such as Switzerland and Italy, adopt the concept of a risk matrix. For instance, the Swiss Federal Office for Water and Geology (1997) classifies risk based on the probability of occurrence (High, Medium, or Low) and the potential extent of damage (High, Medium, or Low), yielding a risk value via a risk matrix. In the 『debris flow potential stream』 risk assessment, the Debris Flow Occurrence Potential Level is equivalent to the occurrence frequency in the risk matrix, while the Protected Household Level is equivalent to the extent of damage. By utilizing a classification risk matrix with these two levels, the 『debris flow potential stream』 risk level is determined. The risk distribution matrix is presented in the table below:

Note: Any publicly released 『debris flow potential stream』 whose affected area contains no protected households, or only public facilities whose competent authority has corresponding control measures in place, shall be reclassified as "Continuous Observation" level.

Content of Investigation Work
I. Determination of Occurrence Potential Level:

Based on the three essential conditions for 『debris flow』 occurrence—sufficient sediment, water, and slope—the most significant influencing factors are selected for scoring: landslide magnitude, slope factor, sediment deposition status, lithology factor, and vegetation factor. Scores are assigned by considering the impact relationship between each factor and the occurrence potential, as shown in the table below, with a maximum score of 100. The 『debris flow』 occurrence potential level is categorized as High, Medium, or Low. A score of 46 points or below is classified as Low Occurrence Potential, 46 to 62 points as Medium Occurrence Potential, and above 62 points as High Occurrence Potential.

Score Distribution Table for Occurrence Potential Factors
Factor Classification Score
Landslide Magnitude (25) Significant Large-Area Collapse 25
Small-Scale Collapse 15
No Apparent Collapse 5
Slope Factor (25) Upstream Area Slope > 50° 25
Upstream Area Slope between 30° and 50° 15
Upstream Area Slope < 30° 5
Sediment Deposit Status (20) Average Particle Size > 30cm 20
Average Particle Size between 7.5cm and 30cm 13
Average Particle Size < 7.5cm 2
No Apparent Deposit Material 2
Lithology Factor (15)※Note 1 Type I (A, D, F Geological Zones) 15
Type II (C, E Geological Zones) 15
Type III (B, G Geological Zones) 5
Vegetation Factor (15) Bare Rock, Rockfall Accumulation 15
Sparse Vegetation 15
Moderately Sparse Vegetation 6
Dense Vegetation 3
Total Maximum Score 100

Note 1: A refers to the Taitung Rift Valley, Eastern Coastal Range; B refers to Schist, Gneiss; C refers to Metamorphosed Sandstone; D refers to Sedimentary Rock; E refers to Lateritic Terrace; F refers to Igneous Rock; G refers to Basin and Plain.

II. Determination of Protected Household Level:

The selection of protected household factors primarily considers two factors: the hazard posed to buildings and the hazard posed to transportation facilities. For buildings, public structures receive the highest score due to higher typical occupancy, and the score increases with the number of protected households. In terms of transportation, bridge damage poses a higher threat to traffic, hence a higher score is assigned. Following the 921 Earthquake and Typhoon Toraji, many 『debris flow potential stream』 have undergone mitigation facility engineering. Therefore, a field assessment of the effectiveness of local mitigation measures is included in the on-site investigation; good results from these measures can reduce the hazard to protected households. The scoring method for the Protected Household Factor is shown in the table below, with a maximum total score of 100, which is the cumulative result of scores for buildings, transportation facilities, and the effectiveness of local mitigation. A resulting score of 60 points or higher is classified as High Protected Household Level; a score between 40 and 60 (exclusive of 60) is Medium; and a score of 40 points or lower is Low.

Protected Household Factor Distribution Table
Factor Classification Score
Buildings (65) Public facilities related to disaster prevention measures (schools, medical facilities, and public shelters, etc.) 65
5 or More Residential Households 60
1 to 4 Residential Households 30
No Households 0
Transportation Facilities (35) Bridge 35
Road 20
None 0
Total Maximum Score 100
Effectiveness of Local Mitigation (100%) Needs Improvement or No Mitigation Facilities 100%
Acceptable 80%
Good or No Mitigation Required 60%
Assessment Result Assessment Result = (Buildings + Transportation Facilities) × Weight
頁面頂端

分享與工具列